Radix Entomolaris – Case series and clinical considerations

Endodontics - Cases
2017-05-26

Many of the difficulties found in root canal treatment are due to variations in root canal morphology (1). Root canal morphology is limitless in its variability and clinicians must be aware that anatomic variations constitute a formidable challenge to endodontic success (2). First reported by Carabelli in 1884 (4), this extra root, that is generally shorter than the disto-buccal root and is usually curved, was named by Bolk “radix entomolaris” (5). The relevant literature revealed an incidence of <5% in Caucasian, African, Eurasian and Indian populations, whereas in those with Mongoloid traits, such as Chinese, Eskimo and Native American populations, the RE occurs with a frequency of 5% and even up to 40% (6-10). 

De Moore et al. (6) classified RE based on the curvature of the root or root canal in bucco-lingual orientation, Carlson and Alexandersen (10) classified four types of RE (A, B, C, and AC), based on the location of the cervical portion of the root and this helps in identification of separate and non separate RE; Song et al. (11) have suggested a new classification based on morphologic characteristics assessed from cross-sectional computed tomography technique (Img. 1). 

Extra roots as the Radix Entomolaris in mandibular molars, are an additional challenge, which begins at case assessment and involves all operative stages; that’s why an early detection of the presence of any anatomical variations is essential to let the clinician choose the best operative strategy in terms of access cavity design, root canal opening localization, canal shaping, filling and restorative techniques (12). Thus, an awareness and understanding of root canal anatomy is essential to carry out a safe shaping respectful of the original endodontic anatomy for improving the predictability of root canal treatment.

Fig. 1

Img. 1 – The table shows the classification of Radix Entomolaris

Fig. 2

Img. 2 – Preoperative detection of RE: Rx examination It is very easy to detect thanks a CBCT scan, though, most of the time, clinicians should try to intercept the presence of the RE by analyzing a bi-dimensional exam in the first place. As the (separate) DL root is usually situated in the same BL plane as the DB root, a superimposition of the two roots may appear on the preoperative radiograph, which may result in difficulty identifying this additional root: the clinician has to look very carefully for the presence of another PDL close to the distal root. A preoperative angled radiograph is useful to avoid the superimposition of the 2 distal roots and clearly see the Radix entomolaris.

Fig. 3

Img. 3 – Preoperative detection of RE: clinical examination At a clinical examination, the probing to the level of the CEJ could be useful to diagnose the presence of the RE. According Krasner and Rankow (13), the walls of the pulp chamber are concentric to the external outline of the tooth at the level of the CEJ; so, if there is a bulge of the CEJ in disto-lingual for the presence of the RE, the pulp chamber also will extend in that direction. Application of Krasner and Rankow Laws eases the creation of a proper access that facilitates the orifice localization of the RE.

Fig. 4

Img. 4 – RE & Shaping. The Radix Entomolaris is a challenge under a shaping point of view: it is thin and curved, so that a very careful shaping procedure is required in order to avoid iatrogenic damage, such as stripping, internal/external transportation, ledge and apical foramen transportation. In this case, a step-down technique has been used: the superimposition of tooth sections at the same level before (black spot) and after shaping (red spot), shows how the rotary file worked in the center of the canal.

Fig. 5

Img. 5 – Clinical case n 1. Female 62 years-old. The presence of RE has been diagnosed at Rx examination. Intraoperative Rxs are useful to better understand the anatomy of the RE. Follow-up at 2 and 4 years.

Fig. 6

Img. 6 – Clinical case n 2. Male, 54 years-old. The presence of a RE has been diagnosed at clinical examination, thanks the probing at CEJ level. 2 years follow-up.

Fig. 7

Img. 7 – Clinical case n 3. Male, 56 years old. The presence of RE has been diagnosed at Rx examination and confirmed at clinical examination, thanks the probing at CEJ level. Mesial angled Rx at 1 year follow-up and distal angled Rx at 3 years follow-up.

Fig. 8
 

Clinicians should have thorough knowledge of the endodontic anatomy and its possible variations. The initial diagnosis of a Radix Entomolaris before root canal treatment is important to facilitate the endodontic procedure, and to avoid ‘missed’ canals that lead to a failure of the therapy.